Since day one of Trump’s presidency, the deep state has used federal courts to shut down Trump’s agenda.
It is their most effective weapon to shut down his America First agenda.
And a federal judge just smacked Trump with life-changing news.
On the campaign trail, there is no issue that Trump excited his base with more than building a wall on the border with Mexico.
It is a way to ensure that illegal immigrants cannot flood into the U.S. like they have for decades.
And the left has been working overtime to prevent it from becoming a reality.
They have been using left-wing federal judges to shut him down.
And U.S. District Court Judge David Briones just handed down a ruling that will put a stop to much of the construction currently occurring at the border.
Briones, who was appointed to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas in 1994 by former President Bill Clinton, ruled that Trump cannot use billions in military funds to pay for the wall.
“After due consideration, the Court is of the opinion that a declaratory judgment and permanent injunction shall be granted in Plaintiffs’ favor,” Briones wrote in the court ruling.
The lawsuit causing this ruling was brought forth by the Border Network for Human Rights, a radical pro-illegal immigration group out of El Paso, Texas.
They claim that Trump overstepped his authority when declaring a national emergency earlier this year to allow him to re-allocate more funds than the $1.3 billion that Congress had authorized him.
The Border Network for Human Rights were represented by Protect Democracy, a left-wing group that regularly files lawsuits against the Trump administration.
“The president’s emergency proclamation was a blatant attempt to grab power from Congress. Today’s order affirms that the president is not a king and that our courts are willing to check him when he oversteps his bounds. This is a huge win for democracy and the rule of law,” said Kristy Parker, counsel for Protect Democracy.
This ruling affects $3.6 billion that Secretary of Defense Mark Esper had already diverted from military construction projects.
A wall on the border is perhaps the best way to secure the nation, making the move entirely logical.
The only people who could be opposed to a wall on the border are doing so simply because they support open borders.
Without borders, a country ceases to have sovereignty.
Around the world, many nations effectively use walls to secure their nations.
The best example is Israel, who has used their wall to virtually eliminate the problem of illegal immigration.
America could have that same protection if Democrats stop trying to impede Trump’s agenda.
Every single day, criminals and drugs flood across the southern border.
A wall will not entirely end the problem, but past examples of walls in other countries prove it will do a lot, and is the most effective deterrent.
Do you support building a wall on the border?
Let us know your thoughts in the comment section below.
