Barack Obama was dreading this moment.
The former President thought he escaped scot-free in the biggest political scandal in American history.
But Barack Obama is going to lose his mind now that this game-changing secret is out.
Now that the Mueller report is public and Donald Trump is definitively cleared of colluding with Russia during the 2016 elections, Americans are demanding to know how the FBI launched a politically motivated witch hunt based on fake news.
One insider has a few answers and they strike at the heart of the Deep State conspiracy against the President.
Former Central Intelligence Agency analyst John Gentry authored a head-turning piece in the International Journal of Intelligence and Counterintelligence about how the nation’s intelligence agencies were stocked top to bottom with liberal activists who had it out for Donald Trump.
“In 2016 observers of U.S. intelligence began to wonder if the CIA’s once-firm prohibition on partisan politics had changed, and to ponder whether a new kind of politicization had arisen: namely, institutionally embedded, partisan bias,” Gentry wrote.
Gentry continued, “The attacks on Trump were unprecedented for intelligence officers in their substance, tone, and volume.”
“Critics went far beyond trying to correct Trump’s misstatements about U.S. intelligence; they attacked him as a human being.”
As evidence, Gentry cited Obama’s CIA Deputy Director Michael Morell injecting himself into the 2016 Presidential election by endorsing Hillary Clinton.
“Morell’s claim that his CIA career qualifies him to make political judgments about domestic issues is incorrect,” Gentry wrote.
“He was trained and authorized to ‘make the call’ about foreign intelligence issues within the classified, internal world of the U.S. government … He did not recommend policies, including voting choices,” Gentry added.
Gentry described how the Obama administration based Pentagon hiring decisions on the applicant’s allegiance to the Democrat Party.
“The U.S. government has traditionally and wisely declined to ask its job applicants and civil service employees about their political affiliations,” he explained, “but [Obama] got around the policy by mandating hiring from demographic groups known to be generally pro-Democratic.”
“In the United States and elsewhere, liberals during the Cold War years often worried that unaccountable intelligence and security agencies were running amok. Now, ‘progressives’ welcome an ideologically center-left ‘deep state,’ built in part upon policies like Obama’s as a check on Trump and conservatives are complaining,” Gentry concluded.
Gentry’s article makes it obvious how high-ranking FBI and intelligence community officials were able to take seriously a document like the fake news Christopher Steele dossier.
James Comey, John Brennan, and their co-conspirators saw the sensational charges in the dossier about the Trump campaign colluding with the Russians and the Russians owning blackmail on Trump and assumed them to be true.
Ultimately, their decision to utilize the dossier as a central piece of “evidence” in the Russia investigation stemmed from one of the most catastrophic cases of confirmation bias in American history.
Do you think Obama embedded Deep State loyalists throughout the federal government?
Let us know your thoughts in the comment section.