There is now bombshell proof that one 2016 candidate colluded with an outside force.
But it wasn’t Donald Trump—it was Hillary Clinton.
And one secret email is the smoking gun that proves her guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Despite the hysterical claims from Democrats and the media, not a single shred of evidence has been discovered showing the Trump campaign colluded with the Russians.
But there are mountains of evidence proving Hillary Clinton’s guilt.
WikiLeaks revealed in a tweet that New York Times national security reporter Scott Shane would routinely email Hillary Clinton’s State Department with a head’s up on stories the paper was planning to publish.
The Daily Wire reports:
“You thought 2017 was going to end without a bang — other than the fireworks?
After The New York Times on Saturday published a story headlined “Republican Attacks on Mueller and F.B.I. Open New Rift in G.O.P.,” WikiLeaks couldn’t stand it anymore. In a late-night post on Twitter, WikiLeaks revealed that a Times reporter used to feed State Department email updates of the stories the paper would be publishing DAYS before the stories appeared.
At the time, Hillary Clinton was the Secretary of State.
The heads-up email was intended to give State (and Clinton) time to come up with some spin for stories that may have caused problems. Or, in another possible scenario, the heads up could give the State Department time to create a diversion for the same day, thus overriding a damaging story with other news its friends in the mainstream media would happily cover instead.
The players in the WikiLeaks email are interesting. Scott Shane is the national security reporter for the Times. And the recipient of his email, Philip Crowley, was at the time the United States Assistant Secretary of State for Public Affairs under Clinton’s State Department.”
Email shows New York Times handed over Cablegate's publication schedule to the US government (without telling @WikiLeaks) giving the State Department, then headed by Hillary Clinton, up to 9 days in advance to spin the revelations or create diversions. https://t.co/IMrDOwoCd2 pic.twitter.com/CT4XkEs8Mc
— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) December 31, 2017
This allowed them to get their ducks in a row to spin the stories in the best possible light.
And it is just another example of how the media was nothing more than an extension of the Democrat Party.