Joe Biden’s Justice Department is pulling out all the stops to not just prosecute and convict Trump, but also to deny him of his constitutional rights during the 2024 election.
It’s an unprecedented step in American history.
And a judge just helped Joe Biden execute this sinister plan to silence Trump in 2024.
Special counsel Jack Smith already concocted an unprecedented legal theory to invent criminal activity and intent on Trump’s part where none existed to bring his indictment against the 45th president for contesting the 2020 election.
Since there is no law explicitly stating what Trump did was illegal Smith had to stitch together a Frankenstein’s monster of an indictment using arcane statutes from the 1800s and never-before-tested interpretations of these statutes to essentially criminalize disagreeing with the Democrats and seeking legal advice on how to proceed.
But now Smith is going one step further.
After claiming Trump’s First Amendment right to redress the government and engage in political activism is now criminal conduct Smith sought to muzzle Trump and deny him his right to free speech for the duration of the trial – which is expected to run during the GOP primary.
Smith argued that an ambiguous social media post where Trump wrote “you come after me and I come after you” was a threat to the prosecutors, judge, jury and witnesses and asked the Obama donor and judge in the case to restrict Trump from speaking about the evidence the prosecution turns over in the course of discovery.
“All the proposed order seeks to prevent is the improper dissemination or use of discovery materials, including to the public. Such a restriction is particularly important in this case because the defendant has previously issued public statements on social media regarding witnesses, judges, attorneys, and others associated with legal matters pending against him. And in recent days, regarding this case, the defendant has issued multiple posts—either specifically or by implication—including the following, which the defendant posted just hours ago,” Smith’s gag motion began.
“If the defendant were to begin issuing public posts using details—or, for example, grand jury transcripts—obtained in discovery here, it could have a harmful chilling effect on witnesses or adversely affect the fair administration of justice in this case,” the filing added.
Trump’s campaign released a statement saying the post had nothing to do with the trial and referred to “the RINO, China-loving, dishonest special interest groups and Super PACs, like the ones funded by the Koch brothers and the Club for No Growth.”
Obama Judge Tanya Chutkan kept trying to keep this trial on its lightspeed pace so Smith could use a verdict to interfere in the 2020 election by giving the Trump team just hours to file an official response to Smith’s motion to muzzle Trump.
Conservative talk show host Mark Levin warned that Smith’s attempt to restrict Donald Trump’s First Amendment rights was another front in his attack on the Constitution, the rule of law and the ability of the American people to choose their own leaders.
“Special Counsel Jack Smith is now monitoring social media. Like the rest of the Biden regime, he seeks to destroy free speech. But in his case, by intimidation of a defendant. Who else’s social media is this Stalinist monitoring? It really is time for Congress to step in and expose what’s going on here. America can’t allow this Stalinist to destroy the criminal justice system, the electoral system, and free speech all at once,” Levin posted on Twitter.
Great American Daily will keep you up to date on any new developments in this ongoing story and the rest of the breaking news in politics, please bookmark our site, consider making us your homepage and forward our content with your friends on social media and email.
